Biomarkers in early breast neoplasia
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
- Vol. 53 (S17G) , 125-131
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240531125
Abstract
Early breast neoplasia may be defined in many ways. Any non‐invasive or invasive but non‐metastatic breast cancer qualifies as early neoplasia in the sense that they are non‐lethal. Before we can prevent lethal breast cancer, we must gain a better understanding of the biological abnormalities underlying its development and progression. Many studies into the mechanisms of breast cancer evolution have evaluated potential precursor lesions (e.g., proliferative disease without atypia [PDWA], atypical ductal hyperplasia [ADH], and ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) for genetic alterations known to occur in fully developed invasive carcinomas. This approach has shed some light on events which may be important in early malignant transformation, including the observations that overexpression of the c‐erbB‐2 oncogene and mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene are present in significant subsets of DCIS, but not PDWA or ADH. This approach is limited by our incomplete knowledge of cancer genetics. However, there is more to learn by evaluating known cancer‐associated genes in potential precursor lesions using established techniques such as immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Until recently, technology could not detect unknown genetic abnormalities in microscopic lesions such as PDWA, ADH, or DCIS. Now, PCR‐based techniques have the theoretical ability to detect novel tumor promoter and suppressor genes in clinical samples of these very small lesions. For example, suppressor‐type genes may be deteted using comprehensive mapping probes to identify loss of heterozygosity in PCR‐amplified DNA extracted from a few hundred cells microdissected from either fresh or archival tissue. Differential display is another new technique with the potential to detect both tumor promoter and suppressor gene expression in very small samples. This PCR method uses short random primer pairs to amplify representative cDNA from microgram quantities of mRNA extracted from fresh tissue. Rapid progress is likely to result from applying these complementary approaches to the challenging problem of breast cancer evolution.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oestrogen receptor expression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: relationship to flow cytometric analysis of DNA and expression of the c-erbB-2 oncoproteinBritish Journal of Cancer, 1993
- Benign breast disease and breast cancer: A case-control study in a cohort in italyInternational Journal of Cancer, 1991
- Potential Value of Hormone Receptor Assay in Carcinoma In Situ of BreastAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1990
- A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesisCell, 1990
- Distribution of estrogen and progesterone receptors in healthy tissue adjacent to breast lesions at various stages — Immunohistochemical study of 107 casesBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1990
- Immunohistochemical distribution of c‐erbB‐2 in infiltrating and in situ breast cancerInternational Journal of Cancer, 1988
- c-erbB-2 expression in benign and malignant breast diseaseBritish Journal of Cancer, 1988
- Prevalence of benign, atypical, and malignant breast lesions in populations at different risk for breast cancer. A forensic autopsy studyCancer, 1987
- The prevalence of carcinoma in situ in normal and cancer-associated breastsHuman Pathology, 1985
- Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Women with Proliferative Breast DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985