Two hypotheses regarding text generation and analysis
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes
- Vol. 12 (4) , 413-460
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538909544739
Abstract
It is proposed here that in any language and for any discourse type within that language the verb forms/clause structures can be arranged in a rank scheme in which a mainline of discourse development is encoded by a characteristic construction (or a very limited set of constructions) while lines of subsidiary development, which represent progressive degrees of departure from the mainline, are encoded in other constructions. It is further proposed that this graded salience scheme can then provide guidelines for the analysis of local spans of text (paragraphs) so that sentences whose independent clauses have constructions which are high in the salience schemes are dominant over ancillary sentences which have constructions which are lower in the scheme. The first hypothesis has more to do with text generation, while the second has to do with text analysis. The two hypotheses are meant to yield salience schemes and constituent analyses which mutually corroborate and correct each other. These hypotheses and their reciprocity are illustrated here relative to narrative discourse in eight languages in five distinct linguistic areas.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relational propositions in discourseDiscourse Processes, 1986
- Introduction to Text LinguisticsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1981
- A spectrum and profile approach to discourse analysisText & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 1981
- Transitivity in Grammar and DiscourseLanguage, 1980
- An anatomy of speech notionsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1976
- The Thread of DiscoursePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1975