When Things That Were Never Experienced Are Easier To “Remember” Than Things That Were
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 9 (6) , 484-489
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00089
Abstract
Can things that were never experienced be more readily accepted on recognition tests than things that were experienced? A current explanation of false memory predicts that this can happen when things that were never experienced provide superior access to the gist of events. This prediction was tested in three experiments in which the task was to accept all test items that were consistent with the substance of previously studied material, regardless of whether they had been studied. Acceptance rates were consistently higher for some never-studied items (those that provided superior access to gist memories) than for studied items. This effect varied predictably as a function of manipulations of the strength of gist memories and their accessibility. These results have implications for the use of exploratory memory-interrogation procedures in psychotherapy and the law.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the development of conscious and unconscious memory.Developmental Psychology, 1998
- Long-term survival of children's false memories: A reviewLearning and Individual Differences, 1997
- Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the dataPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1996
- Are Children's False Memories More Persistent than their True Memories?Psychological Science, 1995
- False-Recognition Reversal: When Similarity is DistinctiveJournal of Memory and Language, 1995
- Surface information loss in comprehensionCognitive Psychology, 1985
- Item and order information in short-term serial memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1976
- Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968
- On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959
- Studies from Princeton Laboratory: Memory for Square size.Psychological Review, 1895