Outbreak of Staphylococcus schleiferi Wound Infections: Strain Characterization by Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Analysis, PCR Ribotyping, Conventional Ribotyping, and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 36 (8) , 2214-2219
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.36.8.2214-2219.1998
Abstract
Within a 1-year period, six surgical-site infections (SSI) caused by Staphylococcus schleiferi were observed in the department of cardiac surgery of Ignatius Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. Since outbreaks caused by this species of coagulase-negative staphylococci have not been described before, an extensive environmental survey and a case control study were performed in combination with molecular typing of the causative microorganism in order to identify potential sources of infection. Variability, as detected by four different genotyping methods (random amplification of polymorphic DNA [RAPD], conventional and PCR-mediated ribotyping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE] of DNA macro restriction fragments), appeared to be limited both among the clinical isolates and among several control strains obtained from various unrelated sources. Among unrelated strains, RAPD and PCR-mediated ribotyping identified two types only, whereas seven different types were identified in a relatively concordant manner by conventional ribotyping and PFGE. The latter two procedures proved to be the most useful tools for tracking the epidemiology of S. schleiferi . Four of the outbreak-related strains were identical by both methods, and two isolates showed limited differences. In the search for a potential source of S. schleiferi infection, two slightly different PFGE types were encountered on several occasions in the nose of a single surgeon. These strains were, however, clearly different from the outbreak type. In contrast, S. schleiferi cultures remained negative for two persons identified on the basis of case control analysis. It was demonstrated that SSI caused by S. schleiferi had a clinical impact for patients comparable to that of a wound infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus . This report describes the first well-documented outbreak of S. schleiferi infection. A source of the outbreak was not detected.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the genomic restriction fragments of coagulase-negative staphylococciFEMS Microbiology Letters, 1994
- Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the genomic restriction fragments of coagulase-negative staphylococciFEMS Microbiology Letters, 1994
- PCR fingerprinting for epidemiological studies of Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Microbiological Methods, 1994
- Comparison of four genotyping assays for epidemiological study of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1994
- Evaluation of two commercial systems for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci to species levelDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1994
- Typing of Clostridium difficile strains by PCR-amplification of variable length 16S-23S rDNA spacer regionsJournal of General Microbiology, 1993
- Epidemiological markers of coagulase-negative staphylococciIntensive Care Medicine, 1993
- Comparison of coagulase-negative staphylococci by pulsed-field gel electrophoresisFEMS Microbiology Letters, 1992
- Comparison of coagulase-negative staphylococci by pulsed-field gel electrophoresisFEMS Microbiology Letters, 1992
- Pathogenicity of Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus schleiferi, and three other coagulase-negative staphylococci in a mouse model and possible virulence factorsCanadian Journal of Microbiology, 1990