Abstract
This case study shows how a quango has failed to achieve effectiveness because its cumbersome structure prevents the active minority pressing for change from achieving it. A catch-22 situation arose in events associated with revising the Act under which the quango was constituted. The main stumbling block preventing proposed revisions from succeeding was Council representation, a critical factor for effective decision-making, as evidenced by its inability to reach a decision on it.

This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit: