Inguinal Versus Scrotal Approach in the Operative Treatment of Hydrocele
- 1 January 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
- Vol. 2 (3) , 211-213
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00365596809135369
Abstract
A series of 99 patients with hydrocele is presented. Sixty-three were treated as outpatients between 1963 and 1965: 21 by puncture and aspiration and 42 by scrotal incision and removal of the hydrocele. A group of 36 patients operated upon as inpatients via the inguinal route in 1962 served as controls. The results showed puncture and aspiration followed by the injection of a sclerosing solution not to be recommendable. Outpatient operation by scrotal incision without drainage gave good results and the patients could be allowed home a few hours later. The dangers attending the scrotal approach were no greater than those carried by the inguinal route. Outpatient operation by scrotal incision is recommended.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A bloodless operation for the radical cure of idiopathic hydroceleBritish Journal of Surgery, 1964
- AN OUTPATIENT OPERATION FOR HYDROCELE OF THE TUNICA VAGINALIS IN ADULTSThe Lancet, 1963
- The Splitting Scrotal IncisionJournal of Urology, 1961
- AETIOLOGY OF THE IDIOPATHIC HYDROCELEBritish Journal of Urology, 1960
- Hydrocele: Studies on Biochemical and Histologic Structure in Relation to TreatmentJournal of Urology, 1959