Peer Review, the Research Assessment Exercise and the Demise of Non-Mainstream Economics
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Capital & Class
- Vol. 22 (3) , 23-51
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030981689806600103
Abstract
This article argues that the theoretical and methodological divisions within economics combined with the institutional arrangement of the Research Assessment Exercise and peer review has produced a state affairs which poses a serious risk to the future existence of non-mainstream economics. The conclusion of the article is that, due to the peer review-led Research Assessment Exercise which governs the disbursement of research monies for British universities, non-mainstream economics will be eliminated from British economic departments within ten years.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research Selectivity, Managerialism, and the Academic Labor Process: The Future of Nonmainstream Economics in U.K. UniversitiesHuman Relations, 1997
- Scientific racism: Reflections on peer review, science and ideologySocial Science & Medicine, 1990
- Measures of Research Output: University Departments of Economics in the UK, 1984-8The Economic Journal, 1990
- University research performance indicators in practice: The University Grants Committee's evaluation of British universities, 1985–86Research Policy, 1989
- Research Policy: Problems with peer review and alternativesBMJ, 1988
- Research Policy: Peering into the bowels of the MRC II: review systemsBMJ, 1988
- Alternatives to review by peers: A contribution to the theory of scientific choiceMinerva, 1984
- Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted againBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982