Regional Availability Of High-Volume Hospitals For Major Surgery
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 23 (Suppl2) , VAR45-45
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.var.45
Abstract
Despite evidence of increased risks, a large number of patients still have surgery in low-volume hospitals. To better understand why, we used Medicare data to study the regional availability of high-volume hospitals. More than half of patients undergoing three procedures in low-volume hospitals lived in regions lacking a high-volume hospital. Some regions simply lacked enough cases to support a high-volume hospital. Other regions had enough cases but too many hospitals performing them. Although consolidation of surgical services may be feasible in some settings, volume-based referral strategies are impractical for many U.S. regions.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measuresSurgery, 2004
- Do Well-Publicized Risk-Adjusted Outcomes Reports Affect Hospital Volume?Medical Care, 2004
- Does it matter what a hospital is “high volume” for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative dataBMJ, 2004
- Regionalization of High-Risk Surgery and Implications for Patient Travel TimesJAMA, 2003
- Physician Staffing Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill PatientsJAMA, 2002
- Large Employers' New Strategies in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Should we regionalize major surgery? potential benefits and policy considerations1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2000
- Patient Preferences for Location of CareMedical Care, 1999
- Influence of Cardiac-Surgery Performance Reports on Referral Practices and Access to Care — A Survey of Cardiovascular SpecialistsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996