An Uneasy Alliance: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Health Education Quarterly
- Vol. 19 (1) , 117-135
- https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819201900108
Abstract
The paper describes the difficulties encountered in trying to combine qualitative and quantitative research methods in a study of the relationship between moral reasoning and teenage drug use. Four problems that arose in the attempt to reduce qualitative data to a quantitative format are described. These problems are: (1) making analytic sense of singular responses; (2) a mistaken logical inference that demands that each pattern of judgment should have discrete behavioral indicators; (3) the construction and use of ideal types; and (4) making analytic sense of universal responses. The roots of these problems are then traced to the underlying philosophical premises that distinguish the qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. The implications of the different goals, assumptions, and standards of evaluation informing each of the respective methods for future research are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpretation and the sciences of manPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2012
- How Teens Think about Drugs: Insights from Moral Reasoning and Social Bonding TheoryInternational Quarterly of Community Health Education, 1991
- Ethnographic and Qualitative Research Design and Why It Doesn't WorkAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1986
- What Quantitative Research Is and Why It Doesn't WorkAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1986
- Sick Individuals and Sick PopulationsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- Social Science as Practical ReasonPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Conceptions of Personal Issues: A Domain Distinct from Moral or Societal ConceptsChild Development, 1981
- Introduction to Critical TheoryPublished by University of California Press ,1980
- The development of moral thought: Review and evaluation of Kohlberg's approach.Psychological Bulletin, 1974