Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Statistical Methods in Medical Research
- Vol. 14 (5) , 515-524
- https://doi.org/10.1191/0962280205sm415oa
Abstract
Publication bias has been previously identified as a threat to the validity of a meta-analysis. Recently, new evidence has documented an additional threat to validity, the selective reporting of trial outcomes within published studies. Several diseases have several possible measures of outcome. Some articles might report only a selection of those outcomes, perhaps those with statistically significant results. In this article, we review this problem while addressing the questions: what is within-study selective reporting? how common is it? why is it done? how can it mislead? how can it be detected?, and finally, what is the solution? We recommend that both publication bias and selective reporting should be routinely investigated in systematic reviews.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjusting for publication bias: modelling the selection processJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2004
- Systematic Reviews in Health CarePublished by Wiley ,2001
- What Works?: Selectivity Models and Meta-AnalysisJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1999
- Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials Why albumin may not workBMJ, 1998
- Publication Bias and Research on Passive SmokingJAMA, 1998
- An Approach for Assessing Publication Bias Prior to Performing a Meta-AnalysisStatistical Science, 1992
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- Selection Models and the File Drawer ProblemStatistical Science, 1988
- Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1988
- Publication bias and clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1987