Strouhal numbers and optimization of swimming by odontocete cetaceans
- 15 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 207 (10) , 1633-1642
- https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00948
Abstract
SUMMARY: Swimming efficiencies of fish and cetaceans have been related to a certain synchrony between stroke cycle frequency, peak-to-peak tail/fluke amplitude and mean swimming speed. These kinematic parameters form a non-dimensional wake parameter, referred to as a Strouhal number, which for the range between 0.20 and 0.40 has been associated with enhanced swimming efficiency for fish and cetaceans. Yet to date there has been no direct experimental substantiation of what Strouhal numbers are preferred by swimming cetaceans. To address this lack of data, a total of 248 Strouhal numbers were calculated for the captive odontocete cetaceans Tursiops truncatus, Pseudorca crassidens, Orcinus orca, Globicephala melaena, Lagenorhynchus obliquidens and Stenella frontalis. Although the average Strouhal number calculated for each species is within the accepted range, considerable scatter is found in the data both within species and among individuals. A greater proportion of Strouhal values occur between 0.20 and 0.30 (74%) than the 0.25–0.35(55%) range predicted for maximum swimming efficiency. Within 0.05 Strouhal increments, the greatest number of Strouhal values was found between 0.225 and 0.275 (44%). Where propulsive efficiency data were available (Tursiops truncatus, Pseudorca crassidens, Orcinus orca), peak swimming efficiency corresponded to this same Strouhal range. The odontocete cetacean data show that, besides being generally limited to a range of Strouhal numbers between 0.20 and 0.40, the kinematic parameters comprising the Strouhal number provide additional constraints. Fluke-beat frequency normalized by the ratio of swimming speed to body length was generally restricted from 1 to 2, whereas peak-to-peak fluke amplitude normalized by body length occurred predominantly between 0.15 and 0.25. The results indicate that the kinematics of the propulsive flukes of odontocete cetaceans are not solely dependent on Strouhal number, and the Strouhal number range for odontocete cetaceans occurs at slightly (∼20%) lower values than previously predicted for maximum swimming efficiency.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maneuvering Hydrodynamics of Fish and Small Underwater VehiclesIntegrative and Comparative Biology, 2002
- Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiencyJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998
- Biomechanical Perspective on the Origin of Cetacean FlukesPublished by Springer Nature ,1998
- SWIMMING KINEMATICS OF A HARBOR PORPOISE (PHOCOENA PHOCOENA) AND AN ATLANTIC WHITE‐SIDED DOLPHIN (LAGENORHYNCHUS ACUTUS)Marine Mammal Science, 1994
- Power Output and Propulsive Efficiency of Swimming Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops Truncatus)Journal of Experimental Biology, 1993
- Dolphin swimming–a reviewMammal Review, 1991
- Foreflipper propulsion in the California sea lion,Zalophus californianusJournal of Zoology, 1987
- Hydromechanics of lunate-tail swimming propulsion. Part 2Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1977
- 14. Some Functional and Structural Characteristics of Cetacean Flippers and FlukesPublished by University of California Press ,1966
- The Speed of Swimming of Fish as Related to Size and to the Frequency and Amplitude of the Tail BeatJournal of Experimental Biology, 1958