A Comparison of Postoperative Pain Experience Following Periodontal Surgery Using Two Local Anesthetic Agents
- 1 October 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 57 (10) , 637-642
- https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1986.57.10.637
Abstract
This controlled, double-blind, split-mouth study was designed to evaluate postoperative pain experience following peridontal surgery on 20 patients. Two, commerically available local anesthetic agents, bupivacaine HC1 and lidocaine HC1, were used. Peridontal surgeries were standardized to minimize differences in difficulty, extent and time. A patient questionnaire was used to collect data for the 24-hour observation period following periodontal surgery. During this period, pain perception was assessed by visual analogue scales. The results indicated that when bupivacaine was used, there was less postoperative pain, fewer postoperative analgesics taken and a longer period of "numbness" (anesthesia) as compared to lidocaine. The patients expressed a strong preference for bupivacaine over lidocaine.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bupivacaine anesthesia—A clinical trial for endodontic therapyOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1983
- Pharmacology of Local Anesthetic AgentsJournal of Dental Research, 1981
- Evaluation of sedative/analgesic combination for postoperative painOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1979
- 99mTc EDHP bone scintiscans in healthy young adults and patients with Reiter's syndrome.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1979
- Studies with pain rating scales.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1978
- Clinical trials with bupivacaine in oral surgeryOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1976
- Binding of Anilide-type Local Anesthetics in Human PlasmaAnesthesiology, 1970
- Pain experience in periodontal surgeryJournal of Periodontal Research, 1967
- Marcaine® in Oral SurgeryActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1966