Party Competition and Institutional Change
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Party Politics
- Vol. 3 (4) , 451-472
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068897003004001
Abstract
A wave of plebiscitary reforms has swept the German states in the past decade. This study uses explanations for cartel party failure as a starting point for investigating why the biggest German parties defected from their long-held consensus against direct democracy. The article shows that, in an increasingly competitive electoral environment, parties were willing to sacrifice long-term benefits in hopes of making short-term electoral gains. More generally, it suggests that the course of institutional reform cannot be understood merely by looking at distributions of party interests and voter preferences. Instead, it is also necessary to examine why political actors come to see their interests in a different light.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cadre, Catch-all or Cartel?Party Politics, 1996
- Cadre, Catch-All or Cartel?Party Politics, 1996
- Politicians against parties: Anti‐party arguments as weapons for change in GermanyEuropean Journal of Political Research, 1996
- Institutional change and political conflict: Evaluating alternative explanations of electoral reform in Costa RicaElectoral Studies, 1995
- Changing Models of Party Organization and Party DemocracyParty Politics, 1995
- The Transformation of European Social DemocracyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1994
- The Logic of Institutional Preferences: German Electoral Law as a Social Choice OutcomeAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1993
- Electoral Systems and Institutional ChoiceComparative Political Studies, 1992
- A Game Theoretic Model of Reform in Latin American DemocraciesAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political PartiesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1990