The Logic of State Primary Classification Schemes

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article evaluates the effectiveness of traditional state primary classification schemes as tools for the study of state primary systems. It calls into question the traditional categories (open, closed, and blanket) and analyzes the validity of research based on these categories. It is also argued that alternative classification schemes fail to overcome problems endemic to the traditional scheme. The authors introduce as a corrective the notion of "subject-relevance"—the notion that primary classifications must be made through the use of criteria relevant to specific end-view studies of state primaries. The authors conclude that state primary classification schemes have an acceptable heuristic function only if the requirement of subject-relevance is followed in their construction and only if the limitations of subject-relevance are acknowledged in their future use.

This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit: