Abstract
A comparison of both methods (ODM and ODG) on 100 persons was undertaken. The ophthalmodynamometry was found to be superior. The ophthalmodynamography in its present form, is especially of advantage in cases of anophthalmos, opacity of refracting media, and extreme miosis where ODM can not be applied. In the rest of the cases it may be applied in addition to dynamometry, also in cases with side differences. In measuring thecerebral circulation and testing vasoactive substances dynamometry is superior.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: