Overall and event-free survival are not improved by the use of myeloablative therapy following intensified chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized phase 3 study
Open Access
- 15 March 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 101 (6) , 2144-2151
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-03-0889
Abstract
We compared the efficacy of intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell rescue with intensified chemotherapy alone in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma. There were 261 eligible patients younger than 66 years with stage II/III multiple myeloma who were randomized after remission induction therapy with vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) to receive intensified chemotherapy, that is, melphalan 140 mg/m2 administered intravenously in 2 doses of 70 mg/m2 (intermediate-dose melphalan [IDM]) without stem cell rescue (n = 129) or the same regimen followed by myeloablative therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, total body irradiation, and autologous stem cell reinfusion (n = 132). Interferon-α–2a was given as maintenance. Of the eligible patients, 79% received both cycles of IDM and 79% of allocated patients actually received myeloablative treatment. The response rate (complete remission [CR] plus partial remission [PR]) was 88% in the intensified chemotherapy group versus 95% in the myeloablative treatment group. CR was significantly higher after myeloablative therapy (13% versus 29%; P = .002). With a median follow-up of 33 months (range, 8-65 months), the event-free survival (EFS) was not different between the treatments (median 21 months versus 22 months; P = .28). Time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer after myeloablative treatment (25 months versus 31 months; P = .04). The overall survival (OS) was not different (50 months versus 47 months; P = .41). Intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy as first-line treatment for multiple myeloma resulted in a higher CR and a longer TTP when compared with intensified chemotherapy alone. However, it did not result in a better EFS and OS.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of 200 mg/m2 melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m2 melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 9502 randomized trialBlood, 2002
- Chromosome 13 abnormalities identified by FISH analysis and serum β2-microglobulin produce a powerful myeloma staging system for patients receiving high-dose therapyBlood, 2001
- Vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) administered as rapid intravenous infusion for first‐line treatment in untreated multiple myelomaBritish Journal of Haematology, 1999
- Induction therapy with vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) and intermediate-dose melphalan (IDM) followed by autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myelomaBone Marrow Transplantation, 1999
- Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a report of 259 cases from the Spanish RegistryBone Marrow Transplantation, 1998
- The Treatment of Multiple MyelomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Multiple myeloma treated with high dose intravenous melphalanBritish Journal of Haematology, 1987
- HIGH-DOSE INTRAVENOUS MELPHALAN FOR PLASMA-CELL LEUKAEMIA AND MYELOMAThe Lancet, 1983
- Tables of the number of patients required in clinical trials using the logrank testStatistics in Medicine, 1982