The effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers’ cognitive capacity and memory
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
- Vol. 39 (3) , 313-327
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159509364309
Abstract
This study examines the combined effects of arousal and valence on viewers’ capacity allocation to and memory for television messages. Results show that when valence (how positive or negative a message is) is controlled, arousing messages are remembered better than calm messages. When arousal is controlled, positive messages are remembered better than negative messages. Reaction time results suggest that capacity allocation is a function of both valence and arousal. Viewers allocate the most capacity to positive arousing messages and the least capacity to negative arousing messages. The calm messages (both positive and negative) fall between these two.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emotion, Hemispheric Specialization, and Visual and Verbal Memory for Television MessagesCommunication Research, 1993
- Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactionsPsychophysiology, 1993
- The Effects of Scene Changes and Semantic Relatedness on Attention to TelevisionCommunication Research, 1993
- The Effects of Related and Unrelated Cuts on Television Viewers' Attention, Processing Capacity, and MemoryCommunication Research, 1993
- The Evening's Bad News: Effects of Compelling Negative Television News Images on MemoryJournal of Communication, 1992
- Effects of negative political advertising on the political processJournal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 1990
- Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex.Psychological Review, 1990
- Influence of Story Schema Development on Children's Attention to TelevisionCommunication Research, 1989
- A Bio‐Informational Theory of Emotional ImageryPsychophysiology, 1979
- Drives and the C. N. S. (conceptual nervous system).Psychological Review, 1955