Differential Item Functioning (DIF) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 44 (Suppl 3) , S95-S106
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245181.96133.db
Abstract
Various forms of differential item functioning (DIF) in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) have been identified. Items have been found to perform differently for individuals of different educational levels, racial/ethnic groups, and/or of groups whose first language is not English. The articles in this section illustrate the use of different methods to examine DIF in relation to English and Spanish language administration of the MMSE. The aim of this article is to provide a context for interpretation of the findings contained in the following set of papers examining DIF in the MMSE. The performance of the MMSE, when administered in English and Spanish, was reviewed. "Translation" has been discussed in the context of measurement bias, illustrating the variability in Spanish translations. Presented are the readability of the MMSE, description of the translation method, the study design and sample for the data set used, together with treatment of missing data, and model assumptions related to the analyses described in the accompanying set of papers examining DIF. The examination of item bias in cognitive impairment assessment instruments has practical and theoretical implications in the context of health disparities. Considerable DIF has been identified in the MMSE. A critical factor that may contribute to measurement bias is language translation and conversion. Once DIF has been established consistently in a measure, decisions regarding adjustments proceed. Perhaps the development of guidelines for appropriate adjustments for DIF correction in self-reported measures represents the next challenge in addressing measurement equivalence in crosscultural research.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Item and Scale Differential Functioning of the Mini-Mental State Exam Assessed Using the Differential Item and Test Functioning (DFIT) FrameworkMedical Care, 2006
- Differential Item Functioning Analysis With Ordinal Logistic Regression TechniquesMedical Care, 2006
- Identification of Measurement Differences Between English and Spanish Language Versions of the Mini-Mental State ExaminationMedical Care, 2006
- Identification of Differential Item Functioning Using Item Response Theory and the Likelihood-Based Model Comparison ApproachMedical Care, 2006
- Differential Item Functioning on the Mini-Mental State ExaminationMedical Care, 2006
- Correlates of mini-mental status examination scores among elderly demented patients: The influence of race-ethnicityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Screening scales for dementia: Toward reconciliation of conflicting cross‐cultural findingsInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 1992
- Sensitivity and specificity of standardized screens of cognitive impairment and dementia among elderly black and white community residentsPublished by Elsevier ,1990
- Limits of the ‘Mini-Mental State’ as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patientsPsychological Medicine, 1982
- “Mini-mental state”Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1975