Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention is the way to manage 'good-risk' prostate cancer
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Reviews Endocrinology
- Vol. 2 (3) , 136-142
- https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0124
Abstract
With the increase in prevalence of prostate cancer following the introduction of PSA screening, most cancers are now detected at an early stage. In patients with 'good-risk' prostate cancer there is a risk of overtreatment, but it is important that this should be balanced with the possibility of undertreating those at risk of disease progression. This review summarizes the case for active surveillance of 'good-risk' prostate cancer, with selective delayed intervention for rapid biochemical progression, assessed by rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or grade progression. The results of a large phase II trial using this approach are also reviewed. A prospective phase II study of active surveillance with selective delayed intervention was initiated in 1995. Patients were managed initially with surveillance; those who had a PSA doubling time (PSADT) of ≤2 years, or grade progression on repeat biopsy, were offered radical intervention. The remaining patients were closely monitored. The cohort now consists of 299 patients with good-risk—or, in men over 70 years of age, intermediate-risk—prostate cancer. The median PSADT was 7 years, 42% had a PSADT >10 years. The majority of patients remain on surveillance. At 8 years, overall actuarial survival was 85%, and disease-specific survival was 99%.To date, this study has shown that most men with 'good-risk' prostate cancer will die of unrelated causes. The approach of active surveillance with selective delayed intervention based on PSADT represents a practical compromise between radical therapy for all patients, which results in overtreatment for patients with indolent disease, and watchful waiting with palliative therapy only, which results in undertreatment for those with aggressive disease. The results at 8 years were favorable. Longer follow-up will be required if the study is to confirm the safety of this approach in men with a long life expectancy (>15 years).Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2004CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2004
- Time Trends in Clinical Risk Stratification for Prostate Cancer: Implications for Outcomes (Data From CaPSURE)Journal of Urology, 2003
- The dynamics of prostate specific antigen during watchful waiting of prostate carcinomaCancer, 2002
- DEDIFFERENTIATION OF PROSTATE CANCER GRADE WITH TIME IN MEN FOLLOWED EXPECTANTLY FOR STAGE T1C DISEASEJournal of Urology, 2001
- Active Monitoring (Deferred Treatment or Watchful Waiting) in the Treatment of Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2001
- Use of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen doubling time to predict outcome after radical prostatectomyProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2000
- EVALUATION OF CHANGES IN PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER MANAGED WITHOUT INITIAL THERAPYJournal of Urology, 1998
- Serial Prostate Specific Antigen Measurements and Progression in Untreated Confined (Stages T0 to 3NxM0, Grades 1 to 3) Carcinoma of ProstateJournal of Urology, 1995
- Observations on the doubling time of prostate cancer.The use of serial prostate-specific antigen in patients with untreated disease as a measure of increasing cancer volumeCancer, 1993
- Deferred Treatment for Prostate CancerBritish Journal of Urology, 1988