Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Human Reproduction
- Vol. 15 (9) , 1879-1880
- https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.9.1879
Abstract
In its recent statement 'Sex Selection and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis', the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine concluded that preimplantation genetic diagnosis for sex selection for non-medical reasons should be discouraged because it poses a risk of unwarranted gender bias, social harm, and results in the diversion of medical resources from genuine medical need. We critically examine the arguments presented against sex selection using preimplantation genetic diagnosis. We argue that sex selection should be available, at least within privately funded health care.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Consortium: preliminary assessment of data from January 1997 to September 1998Human Reproduction, 1999
- Sex selection: the case forThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1999
- Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosisFertility and Sterility, 1999
- The reproductive option of sex selectionHuman Reproduction, 1999
- Gender selection: a crime against humanity or the exercise of a fundamental right?Human Reproduction, 1999
- Sex Preselection: an aid to couples or a threat to humanity?Human Reproduction, 1999
- Births of normal daughters after MicroSort sperm separation and intrauterine insemination, in-vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injectionHuman Reproduction, 1998
- Ethics and society: Social aspects of >800 couples coming forward for gender selection of their childrenHuman Reproduction, 1995
- Choice of baby's sexThe Lancet, 1993