Information on alternative medicine: a collection management issue.
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- Vol. 86 (1) , 95-100
Abstract
Collection management of library materials about alternative medicine may be a growing problem for librarians because differing views exist regarding the acceptability of this information in a public forum. The purpose of the study reported was to investigate possible differences in the views of physicians, medical students, and librarians regarding the availability of information about alternative medicine for both medical students and the general public. Interviews were conducted with two representatives from each group, all of whom are affiliated with the Faculty of Medicine at The University of British Columbia or its library. The study was exploratory in nature, conducted in part to determine whether a larger research project in this area should be mounted. The data revealed considerable differences in opinion about alternative medicine: the librarians were more hesitant about the acceptability of radical or revolutionary materials, particularly those containing information that could result in direct harm to a patient. The physicians and medical students were more confident than the librarians that traditional medical treatment (and therefore information about it) should always be paramount.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Planetree health information services: public access to the health information people want.1994
- Why Unconventional Medicine?New England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Unconventional Medicine in the United States -- Prevalence, Costs, and Patterns of UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Physicians and Healers — Unwitting Partners in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Consumer health information and the not-for-profit health agency.1991