Design and Serendipity in Establishing a Large Cohort with Wide Dietary Intake Distributions
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 December 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 154 (12) , 1119-1125
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/154.12.1119
Abstract
In 1995–1996, the authors mailed a food frequency questionnaire to 3.5 million American Association of Retired Persons members who were aged 50–69 years and who resided in one of six states or two metropolitan areas with high-quality cancer registries. In establishing a cohort of 567,169 persons (340,148 men and 227,021 women), the authors were fortunate in that a less-than-anticipated baseline response rate (threatening inadequate numbers of respondents in the intake extremes) was offset by both a shifting and a widening of the intake distributions among those who provided satisfactory data. Reported median intakes for the first and fifth intake quintiles, respectively, were 20.4 and 40.1 (men) and 20.1 and 40.0 (women) percent calories from fat, 10.3 and 32.0 (men) and 8.7 and 28.7 (women) g per day of dietary fiber, 3.1 and 11.6 (men) and 2.8 and 11.3 (women) servings per day of fruits and vegetables, and 20.7 and 156.8 (men) and 10.5 and 97.0 (women) g per day of red meat. After 5 years of follow-up, the cohort is expected to yield nearly 4,000 breast cancers, more than 10,000 prostate cancers, more than 4,000 colorectal cancers, and more than 900 pancreatic cancers. The large size and wide intake range of the cohort will provide ample power for examining a number of important diet and cancer hypotheses.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical Evidence of Correlated Biases in Dietary Assessment Instruments and Its ImplicationsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Is Shorter Always Better? Relative Importance of Questionnaire Length and Cognitive Ease on Response Rates and Data Quality for Two Dietary QuestionnairesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Evaluation of Alternative Approaches to Assign Nutrient Values to Food Groups in Food Frequency QuestionnairesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- A Search for Recall Bias in a Case-Control Study of Diet and Breast CancerInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Improving Food Frequency QuestionnairesJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 1995
- Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet recordsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1994
- An investigation of recall bias in the reporting of past food intake among breast cancer cases and controls☆Annals of Epidemiology, 1991
- THE IMPACT OF DIETARY MEASUREMENT ERROR ON PLANNING SAMPLE SIZE REQUIRED IN A COHORT STUDYAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1990
- INTERVAL ESTIMATES FOR CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS CORRECTED FOR WITHIN-PERSON VARIATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR STUDY DESIGN AND HYPOTHESIS TESTINGAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1988
- The problem of profound mismeasurement and the power of epidemiological studies of diet and cancerNutrition and Cancer, 1988