Leisure and work ethics and locus of control
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leisure Sciences
- Vol. 4 (4) , 477-485
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408109512982
Abstract
Equivocal findings regarding the relationship between attitudes toward leisure and the extent to which people feel in control of their own fate led to the consideration of possible mediating influences. The current study was an attempt to examine the relationship between locus of control and the affective domain of leisure attitude, or leisure “ethic,” while controlling for the influence of work ethic. The possibility of differences between males and females and students and nonstudents led to four separate subgroup analyses. Results indicated that of the four groups, only female students showed a substantial relationship between locus of control and leisure ethic. In this group, leisure ethic was associated with an external locus of control, the tendency to regard the control of life's circumstances as lying outside oneself. In none of the groups was the influence of work ethic great enough to make an appreciable difference in the relationship between locus of control and leisure ethic. The group differences were discussed in terms of sex‐role orientations and career aspirations.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Leisure Styles: A Conceptual Framework for Modern LeisureThe Sociological Quarterly, 1980
- Some social psychological determinants of perceptions of leisure: Preliminary evidenceLeisure Sciences, 1979
- Protestant Ethic Attitudes Among College StudentsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1975
- Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Work and Leisure: A Simplified ParadigmJournal of Leisure Research, 1972
- The Protestant Ethic as a personality variable.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971
- Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1966