The Ratio Between Projected Area Diameter and Equivalent Diameter of Particulates in Pittsburgh Air
- 1 January 1966
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Aihaj Journal
- Vol. 27 (1) , 39-46
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00028896609342791
Abstract
A horizontal elutriator was designed, fabricated, and calibrated with clouds of spherical polyvinyltoluene latex and styrene divinylbenzene particles. It was used to sample Pittsburgh air and deposit particles from 2.0 to 16 microns equivalent diameter on glass slides. By assuming a parabolic velocity profile between plates approaching infinite width, a theory of deposition was developed which agreed well with experimentally determined particle deposits. We measured deposited particle projected area diameter with a calibrated microscope reticle. The ratio between particle projected area diameter (d p) and equivalent diameter (d e) varied from 0.5 to 2.8 for almost all particles, but was as high as 6.5 in extraordinary cases. Stress is placed on the need for specifying d p or d e based on the applications of sizing data.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of ParticlesNature, 1962
- RatingofDust CollectorsAccording toDust Settling VelocitiesJournal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1961
- The study of air pollution with the electron microscopeQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1956
- Theory of size classification of airborne dust clouds by elutriationBritish Journal of Applied Physics, 1954
- The terminal velocity and size of airborne dust particlesBritish Journal of Applied Physics, 1954
- The relation between free falling speed and particle size of airborne dustsBritish Journal of Applied Physics, 1954
- The significance and application of shape factors in particle size analysisBritish Journal of Applied Physics, 1954