Tunneling or Value Added? Evidence from Mergers by Korean Business Groups
Top Cited Papers
- 17 December 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 57 (6) , 2695-2740
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00510
Abstract
We examine whether firms belonging to Korean business groups (chaebols) benefit from acquisitions they make or whether such acquisitions provide a way for controlling shareholders to increase their wealth by increasing the value of other group firms (tunneling). We find that when a chaebol‐affiliated firm makes an acquisition, its stock price on average falls. While minority shareholders of a chaebol‐affiliated firm making an acquisition lose, the controlling shareholder of that firm on average benefits because the acquisition enhances the value of other firms in the group. This evidence is consistent with the tunneling hypothesis.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Dark Side of Internal Capital Markets: Divisional Rent‐Seeking and Inefficient InvestmentThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- The Effect of Bank Relations on Investment Decisions: An Investigation of Japanese Takeover BidsThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business GroupsThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- Investor Protection and Equity MarketsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- How Different Is Japanese Corporate Finance? An Investigation of the Information Content of New Security IssuesThe Review of Financial Studies, 1996
- Top Executive Rewards and Firm Performance: A Comparison of Japan and the United StatesJournal of Political Economy, 1994
- The international market for corporate control: Mergers and acquisitions of U.S. firms by Japanese firmsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- Private benefits from block ownership and discounts on closed-end fundsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- Managerial Decision Making and Capital StructureThe Journal of Business, 1993
- Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate MergersThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1981