Pooling sera to reduce the cost of HIV surveillance: a feasibility study in a rural Kenyan district
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Vol. 3 (9) , 747-750
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00293.x
Abstract
Seroprevalence studies are crucial in HIV control programs but too expensive at district level. We evaluated the applicability of pooling sera and how it can reduce cost and affect accuracy at district level. 740 samples collected from antenatal clinic attendants for a sentinel survey in a rural Kenyan district were screened individually and in pools of 10. The seroprevalence when measured individually was 7.30%, while the calculated seroprevalence from pooled testing was 7.49%. Pooling was practicable and reduced costs by 62% for a marginal loss of accuracy. It is a useful tool in increasing the affordability of surveillance at district level. A pool size of 8 would have resulted in optimal cost reduction at minimal loss of accuracy.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of pooling, and outpatient laboratory specimens in an anonymous seroprevalence survey of HIV infection in British Columbia, CanadaAIDS, 1995
- Screening tests: Can we get more by doing less?Statistics in Medicine, 1994
- Use of a rapid test and an ELISA for HIV antibody screening of pooled serum samples in Lubumbashi, ZaireJournal of Virological Methods, 1993
- Confidence intervals for seroprevalence determined from pooled seraAnnals of Epidemiology, 1991
- Successful use of pooled sera to determine HIV-1 seroprevalence in Zaire with development of cost-efficiency modelsAIDS, 1990
- Sensitivity and specificity of pooled versus individual sera in a human immunodeficiency virus antibody prevalence studyJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1989
- Evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus seroprevalence in population surveys using pooled seraJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1989