Contribution of hMTH1 to the Maintenance of 8-Oxoguanine Levels in Lung DNA of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Open Access
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 97 (5) , 384-395
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji058
Abstract
Background: The level of 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), a general marker of oxidative DNA damage, in DNA is the result of both an equilibrium between the rates of its formation and removal from DNA by DNA repair enzymes and the removal of 8-oxodGTP from the cellular nucleotide pool by hydrolysis to 8-oxodGMP, preventing its incorporation into DNA. To determine the contribution of each component to the level of 8-oxoG in DNA, we compared 8-oxoG–excising activity (encoded by hOGG1), 8-oxodGTPase activity (encoded by hMTH1), and 8-oxoG levels in DNA from tumors and surrounding normal lung tissues from non–small-cell lung cancer patients. Methods: We measured the level of 8-oxoG in DNA of 47 patients by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrochemical detection (HPLC/ECD), hOGG1 activity in tissue extracts of 56 patients by the nicking assay using an oligodeoxynucleotide containing a single 8-oxoG, and hMTH1 activity in tissue extracts of 33 patients by HPLC/UV detection. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The 8-oxoG level was lower in tumor DNA than in DNA from normal lung tissue (geometric mean: 5.81 versus 10.18 8-oxoG/106 G, geometric mean of difference = 1.75; P<.001). The hOGG1 activity was also lower in tumor than in normal lung tissue (geometric mean: 8.76 versus 20.91 pmol/h/mg protein, geometric mean of difference = 2.39; P<.001), whereas the hMTH1 activity was higher in tumor than in normal lung tissue (geometric mean: 28.79 versus 8.94 nmol/h/mg protein, geometric mean of difference = 0.31; P<.001). The activity of hMTH1 was three orders of magnitude higher than that of hOGG1 (nanomoles versus picomoles per hour per milligram of protein, respectively). Conclusions: Several different components contribute to the maintenance of 8-oxoG levels in human DNA, with the greatest contributor being the removal of 8-oxodGTP from the cellular nucleotide pool by hMTH1.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oxidative DNA damage in cancer patients: a cause or a consequence of the disease development?Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2003
- Oxidative DNA damage: assessment of the role in carcinogenesis, atherosclerosis, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome1 1This article is part of a series of reviews on “Oxidative DNA Damage and Repair.” The full list of papers may be found on the homepage of the journal.Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 2002
- Characterization of a Novel 8-Oxoguanine-DNA Glycosylase Activity in Escherichia coli and Identification of the Enzyme as Endonuclease VIIIJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2000
- Vaccine Entrapment in LiposomesMethods, 1999
- Cloning and characterization of hOGG1 , a human homolog of the OGG1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1997
- The GO system protects organisms from the mutagenic effect of the spontaneous lesion 8-hydroxyguanine (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine)Journal of Bacteriology, 1992
- Oxidative damage to DNA in mammalian chromatinMutation Research/DNAging, 1992
- MutT protein specifically hydrolyses a potent mutagenic substrate for DNA synthesisNature, 1992
- Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodGNature, 1991
- The role of 8-hydroxyguanine in carcinogenesisCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1990