The Chinese Legal System: Continuing Commitment to the Primacy of State Power
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The China Quarterly
- Vol. 159, 673-683
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741000003428
Abstract
On the 50th anniversary of the founding of the PRC, the legal system plays an increasingly significant role in social, economic and even political relationships. Legal norms drawn largely from foreign experiences have been selected and applied through a plethora of newly established institutions. The role of law as a basis for government authority has become a legitimate and significant issue in the broader political discourse. Despite these achievements, law in China remains dependent on the regime's policy goals. Particularly where political prerogatives are at stake, legal requirements appear to pose little restraint on state power. In this sense, the ten years that have passed since Tiananmen appear to have had little impact on the willingness of the party-state to dispense with legal requirements in pursuit of political expediency. If we are to rely upon Dicey's dictum on the rule of law being in effect when the state becomes just another actor, the rule of law in China still seems a distant prospect indeed.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Citizens v. Mandarins: Administrative Litigation in ChinaThe China Quarterly, 1997
- The Execution of Civil Judgments in ChinaThe China Quarterly, 1995
- Antagonistic Contradictions: Criminal Law and Human Rights in ChinaThe China Quarterly, 1995
- Riding the Tiger: Legitimacy and Legal Culture in Post-Mao ChinaThe China Quarterly, 1994
- The Stylization and Regularization of the Management and Operation of the Chinese Arbitration InstituteJournal of International Arbitration, 1994
- Reform without LiberalizationPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- The Chinese Legal System: Reforms In The BalanceThe China Quarterly, 1989