Design of the BRISC study: a multicentre controlled clinical trial to optimize the communication of breast cancer risks in genetic counselling
Open Access
- 3 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cancer
- Vol. 8 (1) , 283
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-283
Abstract
Background Understanding risks is considered to be crucial for informed decision-making. Inaccurate risk perception is a common finding in women with a family history of breast cancer attending genetic counseling. As yet, it is unclear how risks should best be communicated in clinical practice. This study protocol describes the design and methods of the BRISC (Breast cancer RISk Communication) study evaluating the effect of different formats of risk communication on the counsellee's risk perception, psychological well-being and decision-making regarding preventive options for breast cancer. Methods and design The BRISC study is designed as a pre-post-test controlled group intervention trial with repeated measurements using questionnaires. The intervention-an additional risk consultation-consists of one of 5 conditions that differ in the way counsellee's breast cancer risk is communicated: 1) lifetime risk in numerical format (natural frequencies, i.e. X out of 100), 2) lifetime risk in both numerical format and graphical format (population figures), 3) lifetime risk and age-related risk in numerical format, 4) lifetime risk and age-related risk in both numerical format and graphical format, and 5) lifetime risk in percentages. Condition 6 is the control condition in which no intervention is given (usual care). Participants are unaffected women with a family history of breast cancer attending one of three participating clinical genetic centres in the Netherlands. Discussion The BRISC study allows for an evaluation of the effects of different formats of communicating breast cancer risks to counsellees. The results can be used to optimize risk communication in order to improve informed decision-making among women with a family history of breast cancer. They may also be useful for risk communication in other health-related services. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14566836.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical geneticists’ and genetic counselors’ views on the communication of genetic risks: A qualitative studyPatient Education and Counseling, 2008
- Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future RecommendationsMedical Decision Making, 2007
- The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire as an outcome of genetic counseling: Reliability and validity of the instrumentAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2006
- Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatmentPatient Education and Counseling, 2004
- Risk communication strategies: state of the art and effectiveness in the context of cancer genetic servicesEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Genetic Heterogeneity and Penetrance Analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Breast Cancer FamiliesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1998
- The Risk of Cancer Associated with Specific Mutations ofBRCA1andBRCA2among Ashkenazi JewsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjectsPsychological Medicine, 1997
- Some Criteria for Evaluating Risk MessagesRisk Analysis, 1993
- Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988