Comparison of discovery limits for extraZbosons at future colliders
- 1 February 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 51 (3) , 1402-1405
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.51.1402
Abstract
We study and compare the discovery potential for heavy neutral gauge bosons (Z’) at various and colliders that are planned or have been proposed. Typical discovery limits are for the Fermilab Tevatron ∼1 TeV, Di-Tevatron ∼2 TeV, CERN LHC ∼4 TeV, LSGNA (a 60 TeV pp collider) ∼13 TeV while the discovery limits are 2–10× √s with the large variation reflecting the model dependence of the limits. While both types of colliders have comparable discovery limits the hadron colliders are generally less dependent on the specific Z’ model and provide more robust limits since the signal has little background. In contrast, discovery limits for limits are more model dependent and, because they are based on indirect inferences of deviations from standard model predictions, they are more sensitive to systematic errors.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved bounds on extended gauge models from new LEP dataPhysics Letters B, 1991
- Atomic parity violation in extended gauge models and latest CDF and LEP dataPhysics Letters B, 1991
- Neutral current and LEP constraints on an extra E6 neutral gauge boson. A global fit to electroweak parametersPhysics Letters B, 1991
- SU(5)c color model signatures at hadron collidersPhysics Letters B, 1990
- Bounds on extended gauge models from LEP dataPhysics Letters B, 1990
- Ununifying the standard modelPhysical Review Letters, 1989
- Comprehensive analysis of data pertaining to the weak neutral current and the intermediate-vector-boson massesPhysical Review D, 1987
- Neutral-current constraints on heavy Z bosonsPhysics Letters B, 1986
- New heavy gauge bosons inandcollisionsPhysical Review D, 1984
- New approach to left-right-symmetry breaking in unified gauge theoriesPhysical Review D, 1984