Percutaneous versus Open Tracheostomy
- 1 August 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
- Vol. 41 (2) , 245-250
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199608000-00008
Abstract
Percutaneous tracheostomy has been advocated as a faster, safer, and less invasive method of placing tracheostomy tubes in ventilated patients. To compare outcome differences, as measured by complication rates, between percutaneous and open tracheostomy, a retrospective cohort study was performed. All procedures were performed in the intensive care unit of a university-affiliated hospital. The minor complication rates did not differ significantly between percutaneous and open tracheostomy (12/31 vs. 12/29, respectively; p > 0.05), nor did there appear to be a difference in rates of major complications between the two groups (7/31 vs. 5/29; p > 0.05). This study identified a trend towards an increased risk of delayed airway loss in the percutaneous tracheostomy group.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous tracheostomy—A new methodCritical Care Medicine, 1989
- Timing of Tracheostomy in the Critically III PatientChest, 1989
- Consensus Conference on Artificial Airways in Patients Receiving Mechanical VentilationChest, 1989
- Percutaneous endoscopic tracheostomyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
- Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy: Experience with 55 Elective ProceduresThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Clinical Experience with Percutaneous Tracheostomy and Cricothyroidotomy in 100 PatientsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1986
- Tracheostomy in the Intensive Care UnitChest, 1986
- Prolonged endotracheal intubation vs. tracheostomyCritical Care Medicine, 1986
- Elective Percutaneous Dilatational TracheostomyChest, 1985
- APACHE—acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification systemCritical Care Medicine, 1981