Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 16 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 4 (10) , e297-835
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297
Abstract
Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.Keywords
This publication has 222 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exposure to Alternaria alternata in US homes is associated with asthma symptomsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2006
- A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiologyNature Genetics, 2006
- REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)British Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women StudyThe Lancet, 2003
- Use and misuse of population attributable fractions.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- A note on the presentation of matched case‐control dataStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution biasPublished by Elsevier ,1990
- No Adjustments Are Needed for Multiple ComparisonsEpidemiology, 1990
- Regression Estimation after Correcting for AttenuationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1978