How computer graphing programs change the graph design process
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation
- Vol. 18 (4) , 4-20
- https://doi.org/10.1145/192433.192438
Abstract
Graphing experts often critique the fill patterns which appear in many computer-generated graphs and charts because they can distract from and even distort the information. One of the reasons these fill patterns are so problematic is that they are automatically inserted into any plot a user chooses. In this paper I present both a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of fill patterns and the results of research which compares the ways in which both computer designers and paper-and-pencil designers fill the enclosed areas of their graphs and charts. Results show that automatically placed fill patterns exert strong behavioral influences on computer designers and result in decisions that might be different than if they were using paper and pencil.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mapping It OutPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1993
- Color in Electronic DisplaysPhysics Today, 1992
- The role of drawing in the graphic design processDesign Studies, 1991
- The importance of drawing in the mechanical design processComputers & Graphics, 1990
- Editing: The Design of RhetoricPublished by SAGE Publications ,1989
- Selected graph design variables in four interpretation tasks: a microcomputer-based pilot studyBehaviour & Information Technology, 1988
- Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific DataScience, 1985
- A Color-Caused Optical Illusion on a Statistical GraphThe American Statistician, 1983