Enteral tube feeding in the intensive care unit
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 27 (7) , 1252-1256
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199907000-00003
Abstract
Objective To evaluate those factors that impact on the delivery of enteral tube feeding. Design Prospective study. Setting Medical intensive care units (ICU) and coronary care units at two university-based hospitals. Patients Forty-four medical ICU/coronary care unit patients (mean age, 57.8 yrs; 70% male) who were to receive nothing by mouth and were placed on enteral tube feeding. Interventions Rate of enteral tube feeding ordered, actual volume delivered, patient position, residual volume, flush volume, presence of blue food coloring in oropharynx, and stool frequency were recorded every 4 hrs. Duration and reason for cessation of enteral tube feeding were documented. Measurements and Main Results Physicians ordered a daily mean volume of enteral tube feeding that was 65.6% of goal requirements, but an average of only 78.1% of the volume ordered was actually infused. Thus, patients received a mean volume of enteral tube feeding for all 339 days of infusion that was 51.6% of goal (range, 15.1% to 87.1%). Only 14% of patients reached >or=to90% of goal feeding (for a single day) within 72 hrs of the start of enteral tube feeding infusion. Of 24 patients weighed before and after, 54% were noted to lose weight on enteral tube feeding. Declining albumin levels through the enteral tube feeding period correlated significantly with decreasing percent of goal calories infused (p = .042; r2 = .13). Diarrhea occurred in 23 patients (52.3%) for a mean 38.2% of enteral tube feeding days. In >1490 bedside evaluations, patients were observed to be in the supine position only 0.45%, residual volume of >200 mL was found 2.8%, and blue food coloring was found in the oropharynx 5.1% of the time. Despite this, cessation of enteral tube feeding occurred in 83.7% of patients for a mean 19.6% of the potential infusion time. Sixty-six percent of the enteral tube feeding cessations was judged to be attributable to avoidable causes. Conclusions The current manner in which enteral tube feeding is delivered in the ICU results in grossly inadequate nutritional support. Barely one half of patient caloric requirements are met because of underordering by physicians and reduced delivery through frequent and often inappropriate cessation of feedings. (Crit Care Med 1999; 27:1252-1256)Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the Route of Feeding Modify Gut Barrier Function and Clinical Outcome in Patients After Major Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery?Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1997
- A study of problems associated with the delivery of enteral feed in critically ill patients in five ICUs in the UKIntensive Care Medicine, 1997
- Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patientCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- EARLY ENTERAL FEEDING IS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ATTENUATION OF THE ACUTE PHASE/CYTOKINE RESPONSE AND IMPROVED OUTCOME FOLLOWING MULTIPLE TRAUMAPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1994
- Effect of fasting, hypocaloric feeding, and refeeding on the energetics of stimulated rat muscle as assessed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1993
- Enteral Versus Parenteral Feeding Effects on Septic Morbidity After Blunt and Penetrating Abdominal TraumaAnnals of Surgery, 1992
- Effect of Malnutrition on Aerobic and Anaerobic Performance of Fast‐ and Slow‐Twitch Muscles of RatsJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1992
- Use of Residual Volume as a Marker for Enteral Feeding Intolerance: Prospective Blinded Comparison With Physical Examination and Radiographic FindingsJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1992
- Immediate enteral nutrition following multisystem trauma: a decade perspective.Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 1991
- Enteral versus Parenteral Nutritional Support following Laparotomy for Trauma: A Randomized Prospective TrialPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1986