DIFFICULTY FOR CONSENSUS IN SIMULTANEOUS OPINION FORMATION OF SZNAJD MODEL
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Mathematical Sociology
- Vol. 28 (1) , 25-33
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00222500490278531
Abstract
In the Sznajd model of 2000, a pair of neighboring agents on a square lattice convinces its six neighbors of the pair opinion if and only if the two agents of the pair share the same opinion. Now we replace the usual random sequential updating rule (corresponding to informal encounters) by simultaneous updating (like in formal votes during meetings) and find that this change makes a complete consensus much more difficult. The reason is that for simultaneous updating some agents simultaneously receive conflicting messages from different neighbor pairs (called frustration) and thus refuse to change their opinion.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- PHASE TRANSITIONS, MEMORY AND FRUSTRATION IN A SZNAJD-LIKE MODEL WITH SYNCHRONOUS UPDATINGInternational Journal of Modern Physics C, 2003
- Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processesPhysica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2003
- Ferromagnetic phase transition in Barabási–Albert networksPhysica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2002
- Statistical mechanics of complex networksReviews of Modern Physics, 2002
- The transmission and persistence of ‘urban legends’: Sociological application of age‐structured epidemic modelsThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2001
- Unanimous opinions in social influence networksThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2001
- The Dissemination of CultureJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1997
- Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour. I. mean‐behaviour description of a strikeThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1982
- Dynamic models of segregation†The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1971
- The checkerboard model of social interactionThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1971