Deposition Testimony and the Surrogate Witness
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 9 (2) , 281-288
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283092013
Abstract
The present study tested the hypothesis that jurors' impressions of an absentee witness and his or her testimony are biased by the -individual who reads the deposition. A total of 88 undergraduates watched a videotape of testimony in which the respondent, presented as either the actual witness or a surrogate reader, displayed either a positive or negative demeanor. Results showed that the demeanor of the reader (an irrelevant cue), as well as the witness (a relevant cue), affected subjects' verdicts and perceptions of testimonial credibility. These findings illustrate a bias in social perception and persuasion that can be termed a "messenger effect." The implications for the increased use of videotaped depositions in the courtroom are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Juror decision-making models: The generalization gap.Psychological Bulletin, 1981
- The Trial: A Research ReviewsPublished by Springer Nature ,1981
- Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- The Effect of Looking Behavior on Perceptions of a Communicator's Credibility1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1978
- Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speechJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978
- Juror Responses to Direct and Mediated Presentations of Expert Testimony1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1977
- Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Attitude attribution when behavior is constrainedJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974
- Prestige, Suggestion, and AttitudesThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1936