Statistical issues in interpreting clinical trials
Open Access
- 7 April 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 255 (5) , 529-537
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01320.x
Abstract
: Randomized clinical trial is an important research tool in evaluating new therapeutic agents, devices and procedures. In order to obtain reliable and unbiased results, careful consideration must be given in the design and conduct of the trial. However, bias can be introduced in the analysis of the final data if certain principles are not followed. Several issues are described that make interpretation of analyses challenging. These include the intent‐to‐treat principle, the use of surrogate outcome measures, subgroup analyses, missing data and noninferiority trials.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Presalvage prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time as predictors of biochemical failure of salvage cryotherapy in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapyCancer, 2006
- The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Preliminary Report: Effect of Encainide and Flecainide on Mortality in a Randomized Trial of Arrhythmia Suppression after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Definition and operational criteriaStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- The randomized clinical trial: bias in analysis.Circulation, 1981
- The FDA's Critique of the Anturane Reinfarction TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Influence of Adherence to Treatment and Response of Cholesterol on Mortality in the Coronary Drug ProjectNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Sulfinpyrazone in the Prevention of Sudden Death after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Controversy in Counting and Attributing Events in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Sulfinpyrazone in the Prevention of Cardiac Death after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978