Chemoattraction and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum: myxamoeba cannot read spatial gradients of cyclic adenosine monophosphate.
Open Access
- 1 June 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in The Journal of cell biology
- Vol. 98 (6) , 2204-2214
- https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.98.6.2204
Abstract
Myxamoebae of the morphogenetic cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum are thought to be able to accurately read and respond to directional information in spatial gradients of cyclic AMP. We examined the spatial and temporal mechanisms proposed for chemotaxis by comparing the behavior of spreading or evenly distributed cell populations after exposure to well-defined spatial gradients. The effects of gradient generation on cells were avoided by using predeveloped gradients. Qualitatively different responses were obtained using (a) isotropic, (b) static spatial, or (c) temporal (impulse) gradients in a simple chamber of penetrable micropore filters. We simulated models of chemotaxis and chemokinesis to aid our interpretations. The attractive and locomotory responses of populations were maximally stimulated by 0.05 microM cyclic AMP, provided that cellular phosphodiesterase was inhibited. But a single impulse of cyclic AMP during gradient development caused a greater and qualitatively different attraction. Attraction in spatial gradients was only transient, in that populations eventually developed a random distribution when confined to a narrow territory. Populations never accumulated nor lost their random distribution even in extremely steep spatial gradients. Attraction in spatial gradients was inducible only in spreading populations, not randomly distributed ones. Thus, spatial gradients effect biased-random locomotion: i.e., chemokinesis without adaptation. Cells cannot read gradients; the reaction of the cells is stochastic. Spatial gradients do not cause chemotaxis, which probably requires a sharp stimulant concentration increase (a temporal gradient) as a pulse or impulse. The results also bear on concepts of how embryonic cells might be able to decipher the positional information in a morphogen spatial gradient during development.This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dictyostelium Chemotactic Response to Spatial and Temporal Gradients. Theories of the Limits of Chemotactic Sensitivity and of PseudochemotaxisJournal of Cellular Biochemistry, 1982
- “Pseudochemotaxis” by micro-organisms in an attractant gradientJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1980
- Chemotaxis of neutrophil leukocytes towards substratum-bound protein attractantsExperimental Cell Research, 1978
- Essential role of surface-bound chemoattractant in leukocyte migrationNature, 1977
- Chemotactic transport theory for neutrophil leukocytesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1976
- Retraction fibers and leucocyte chemotaxisExperimental Cell Research, 1974
- Chemotaxis and the early stages of aggregation in cellular slime moldsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1971
- Diffusion in EmbryogenesisNature, 1970
- Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiationJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1969
- Cell aggregation in Dictyostelium discoideumDevelopmental Biology, 1961