AIDS, ETHICS, AND THE BLOOD SUPPLY

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Although the conference was not held to determine policy, certain issues emerged which should be of interest to all involved with the initiation of anti-HTLV-III testing. First, there was a consensus that an implementation period during which donors will not be notified of the test results is essential. During this period, test proficiency, data confidentiality safeguards, and positive donor counseling procedures can be established. Also, during this period alternative test sites can be established; this was considered a critical step to maintain the safety of the blood supply. Second, there was a perceived need for legislation to protect the confidentiality of sensitive test data, whether in the laboratory or as part of a deferral list system, from subpoena. Third, there was not agreement about whether inventory should be tested; donors who provided that inventory did not know it was to be tested, and might not have consented if the implications of testing had been known. But, inventory testing is clearly in the interest of the recipient. Finally, there was an awareness in the blood banking community of their new role in monitoring a public health menace, and a beginning acceptance of this role emerged.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: