Measuring injury risk factors: question reliability in a statewide sample
Open Access
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Injury Prevention
- Vol. 6 (2) , 148-150
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.6.2.148
Abstract
Background—Recently (1996–98), Colorado added 15 questions pertaining to injury related risks and behaviors to the behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS). Questions addressed bicycle helmet use, traffic crashes, exposure to violence, suicidal behavior, and gun storage. Objective—To measure the test-retest reliability of these injury related questions. Methods—Of 330 BRFSS participants, 229 (69%) were called a second time and reasked nine selected injury questions. Retests were completed 7–28 days after the original interview. Results—Test-retest agreement was very high (κ >0.80) for bicycle helmet use, domestic police visits, and gun ownership. All other injury risk questions had substantial agreement (κ >0.60). Conclusions—The injury related questions added to the Colorado BRFSS have high test-retest reliability.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reproducibility of Responses to Telephone Interviews: Demographic Predictors of Discordance in Risk Factor StatusAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- Should an expected number of cases be an integer?1994
- The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire: its reliability in a statewide sample.American Journal of Public Health, 1993
- Reliability of the Behavioral Risk Factor Survey in a Triethnic PopulationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1991
- High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTICAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical DataPublished by JSTOR ,1977