Alcohol‐Related Efficiency Deficits Using an Ecologically Valid Test

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This study investigated whether male and female alcoholics and controls differed in their ability to solve an ecologically valid measure of abstraction. Ninety-one alcoholics (39 females, 52 males) and 61 community controls (36 females, 26 males) completed a battery of abstraction tasks including a Piagetian-type task, the Plant Task. The Plant Task demands that subjects predict the outcome of an unseen plant given a specific treatment regime. No group differences in the ability to correctly predict the unseen plant's outcome were obtained. Alcoholics were significantly poorer than controls in isolating the relevant variable (χ2 (1) = 8.24, p = 0.004). There were no sex differences in the ability to isolate the relevant variable. However, there was a sex effect in the number of irrelevant explanations (χ2 (3) = 15.58, p = 0.001) with females producing more than males and female alcoholics more than any of the other three cells. These data suggest that (1) alcoholics may exhibit subtle abstraction deficits most readily observed in tasks examining process as opposed to final performance, (2) males and females differ in their response patterns regarding irrelevant material, and (3) further empirical study of the Plant Task may support its use in experimental and clinical settings.