Words of power: Personal empowerment and healing
- 1 September 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
- Vol. 7 (3) , 221-240
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00049311
Abstract
This paper examines instances of ritual use of words in a diverse selection of alternative healing groups in a modern society. These words are distinguished by their users' belief that they are endowed with a power, an effectiveness, separate from and in addition to their literal meaning. Three specific features of ritual language contribute to its effectiveness: (1) its function as an objectification of power, (2) its transformative functions — especially its metaphoric and metonymic usages, and (3) its performative aspects. This paper argues that one of the key factors in healing illness is mobilizing resources of power, especially enhancing the ill person's sense of personal empowerment. Ritual language use in alternative healing is one of the foremost elements in this empowerment, because it both represents and objectifies power. Within a belief system in which they are significant, words of power indeed have the power to effect healing.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prayer as Person: The Performative Force in Navajo Prayer ActsHistory of Religions, 1977
- Some Implications of Medical Beliefs and Practices for Social AnthropologyAmerican Anthropologist, 1976
- shamans, power symbols, and change in Argentine Toba culture1American Ethnologist, 1975
- Some Issues for a Comparative Study of Medical HealingInternational Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1973
- "Performative Utterances" in African RitualsHistory of Religions, 1973
- Cultural Factors and the Response to Pain: A Review1American Anthropologist, 1968
- The Magical Power of WordsMan, 1968
- Shamans and Acute Schizophrenia1American Anthropologist, 1967
- Medicine as an Ethnographic Category: The Gimi of the New Guinea HighlandsEthnology, 1967
- Stress, Illness Behavior, and the Sick RoleAmerican Sociological Review, 1961