Causes of Breast Cancer Malpractice Litigation
- 1 May 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 127 (5) , 542-547
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420050062008
Abstract
• To determine objectively the patient and physician factors that lead to breast cancer malpractice litigation, a review was undertaken of all cases tried in the US federal and state civil court system over a 20-year period from 1971 through 1990. Forty-five cases were identified and all involved a delayed diagnosis of breast cancer (the mean delay was 15 months). The patients were young (mean age, 40 years). Of 45 cases studied, the majority of patients (37 [82%]) found a painless mass by self-examination of the breast. Only 22 patients (49%) had further workup, mostly by mammography (20 [44%]). The results of 16 mammograms (80%) were read as normal. Obstetricians and gynecologists were involved in the greatest number of cases (21 [50%]), followed by family practitioners and internists (17 [41%]), general surgeons (12 [28%]), and radiologists (4 [10%]). (Arch Surg. 1992;127:542-547)Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medicolegal aspects of breast imaging: variable standards of care relating to different types of practice.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1991
- Medical and legal implications of screening and follow-up procedures for breast cancerCancer, 1990
- Mammography in women under age 30: is there clinical benefit?Radiology, 1986
- Growth rates of primary breast cancersCancer, 1979
- Cancer and malpractice claimsCancer, 1977
- Analysis of survival and recurrence vs. patient and doctor delay in treatment of breast cancerCancer, 1975
- Cancer of the breast and pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1930