A Prospective Study of Lung Water Measurements during Patient Management in an Intensive Care Unit

Abstract
We prospectively evaluated a protocol that included extravascular thermal volume (ETV) as a measure of extravascular lung water (EVLW) instead of pulmonary artery wedge pressure (Ppaw) measurements to guide the hemodynamic management of 48 critically ill patients. Patients were randomized to either a protocol management (PM), or to a routine management (RM) group. In the RM group, EVLW measurements were unknown to the primary care physicians. The 2 groups were similar with respect to age, gender, and severity of illness. In patients with initially high EVLW, EVLW fell to a greater extent in PM than in RM patients (18 .+-. 5 versus 4 .+-. 8% decrease, p < 0.05). This difference was even greater in patients with heart failure. No adverse effects on oxygenation or renal function occurred in following the protocol. Mortality for the groups as a whole was similar, but was significantly better (p < 0.05) for PM patients with initially high EVLW and normal Ppaw (predominantly patients with sepsis or the adult respiratory distress syndrome). For both groups, patients with an initial EVLW > 14 ml/kg had a significantly greater mortality than did those with a lesser amount of EVLW: 13 of 15 (87%) versus 13 of 32 (41%), p < 0.05. We conclude that management based on a protocol using EVLW measurements is safe, may hasten the resolution of pulmonary edema, and may lead to improved outcome in some critically ill patients.