Why Do Some Patients Have High Defibrillation Thresholds at Defibrillator Implantation?.
- 1 February 1994
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 17 (2) , 222-239
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01375.x
Abstract
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, for the few patients with unacceptably high defibrillation thresholds at implantation the risk of sudden death may remain high. If a small number of defibrillation attempts are used to determine a defibrillation threshold, then a high defibrillation threshold may occur in some patients due to the probabilistic nature of defibrillation: a small percentage of shocks will fail even at optimal shock strengths. Basic investigations have suggested mechanisms for high defibrillation thresholds in other patients. The extracellular potential gradients produced by a shock correlate with ability to defibrillate and may be used to classify mechanisms for high defibrillation thresholds. Computerized mapping studies have demonstrated that extracellular potential gradient fields produced by defibrillation shocks are uneven with high gradient areas close to the electrodes and low gradient areas distant from the electrodes. A high defibrillation threshold may occur because: (1) a shock creates a subthreshold potential gradient in the low gradient areas; (2) a patient has a higher minimum potential gradient threshold than other patients; or (3) a shock leads to refibrillation in the high gradient areas. This article reviews experimental evidence to support each of these three possibilities then suggests experimental and clinical investigations that may clarify the causes of high defibrillation thresholds in patients.Keywords
This publication has 97 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of long-term amiodarone therapy on the defibrillation threshold and the rate of shocks of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Patients with a high defibrillation threshold: Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomeAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Efficacy and safety of monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks using a braided endocardial defibrillation lead systemAmerican Heart Journal, 1990
- LV mass and defibrillation thresholdAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: Reappraisal of the “defibrillation threshold” conceptAmerican Heart Journal, 1987
- Clinical experience, complications, and survival in 70 patients with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator.Circulation, 1985
- Factors influencing the success of ventricular defibrillation in man.Circulation, 1979
- Effectiveness of direct current defibrillation: Role of paddle electrode sizeAmerican Heart Journal, 1977
- Electrical threshold for defibrillation of canine ventricles following myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1974
- Transmembrane electrical potentials in ventricular tachycardia and fibrillationAmerican Heart Journal, 1959