Abstract
Feeding choice of the echinoid Evechinus chloroticus was examined for six fucoid and one laminarian species of algae. Three experiments were conducted to determine the algal choice by echinoids under controlled conditions. In the first experiment, the seven algal species were presented to echinoids in laboratory conditions. The second experiment had replicates of the algal species placed randomly on a subtidal rocky reef where echinoids were abundant and randomly dispersed. For the third experiment, which was also field-based, replicates of one highly-ranked species, Ecklonia radiata, were presented to naturally dispersed Evechinus. In addition, a series of controlled observations was used to examine the order in which echinoids removed algae from mixed species stands on subtidal boulders and to determine if this was related to the experimentally demonstrated choices of algal species. The results of the first two experiments showed that there were differences between algal species in the amount of material grazed by echinoids. Rankings of algal species from the field experiment were not correlated with rankings from the laboratory experiment. The order of removal of algal species from natural stands was correlated with the laboratory-based experimental rankings of algal species, but not with the rankings from the field-based experiment or with algal species availability. There were differences between algal species in their vulnerability to grazing by echinoids, as measured by regression analyses on the amount of material grazed from algal replicates vs. the number of attached echinoids. Within each species, echinoid numbers exerted a non-linear effect on the removal of algal material. In the third experiment, where only one species of algae was presented, the echinoids still distributed themselves non-randomly amongst replicates, aggregating on some samples. Data on the finer scale distribution of algal species over the entire subtidal reef on which these experiments and observations were conducted indicate that Evechinus are not often presented with a choice of adult plants of several different species in natural stands. The evidence from this study supports the conclusion that feeding preferences by echinoids are labile and do not clearly exert the major influence on the removal of plants from natural stands. Preference, as determined from experimental rankings of algal species, is only one of a number of factors which may affect the removal of algae by echinoids. Other important factors are the density of echinoids present, algal susceptibility to removal, and the distribution and abundances of the various algal species and echinoids relative to each other. It is suggested that algal life history characteristics may be unaffected by echinoids and that coevolutionary arguments are not appropriate for describing echinoid-algal interactions.