Banks as Liquidity Providers: An Explanation for the Coexistence of Lending and Deposit‐taking
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 57 (1) , 33-73
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00415
Abstract
What ties together the traditional commercial banking activities of deposit‐taking and lending? We argue that since banks often lend via commitments, their lending and deposit‐taking may be two manifestations of one primitive function: the provision of liquidity on demand. There will be synergies between the two activities to the extent that both require banks to hold large balances of liquid assets: If deposit withdrawals and commitment takedowns are imperfectly correlated, the two activities can share the costs of the liquid‐asset stockpile. We develop this idea with a simple model, and use a variety of data to test the model empirically.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- LAPM: A Liquidity‐Based Asset Pricing ModelThe Journal of Finance, 2001
- The Paradox of LiquidityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998
- The Channel of Monetary Transmission to Demand: Evidence from the Market for Automobile CreditJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1998
- Deposit Liquidity and Bank MonitoringJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1998
- Capital market frictions and the role of internal capital markets in bankingJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- Bank Loan Commitment Contracts: Data, Theory, and TestsJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1997
- RETHINKING RISK MANAGEMENTJournal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1996
- Financial innovation and the management and regulation of financial institutionsJournal of Banking & Finance, 1995
- The Capital Structure PuzzleThe Journal of Finance, 1984
- Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and LiquidityJournal of Political Economy, 1983