Hospital procedure volume and teaching status do not influence treatment and outcome measures of rectal cancer surgery in a large general population
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Vol. 4 (3) , 324-330
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80083-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should hepatic resections be performed at high-volume referral centers?Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1998
- Variations in treatment of rectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1997
- Relation of Perioperative Deaths to Hospital Volume Among Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Resection for MalignancyAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- The Effects of Regionalization on Cost and Outcome for One General High-Risk Surgical ProcedureAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Mesorectal excision for rectal cancerThe Lancet, 1993
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival.BMJ, 1991
- LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA DUE TO INADEQUATE SURGICAL RESECTIONThe Lancet, 1986
- Physician and Hospital Factors Associated With Mortality of Surgical PatientsMedical Care, 1986
- Effect of surgical experience on the results of resection for oesophageal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986