Genes, Race, and Population: Avoiding a Collision of Categories
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 96 (11) , 1965-1970
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2005.067926
Abstract
A wide array of federal mandates have a profound impact on the use of racial and ethnic categories in biomedical research, clinical practice, product development, and health policy. Current discussions over the appropriate use of racial and ethnic categories in biomedical contexts have largely focused on the practices of individual researchers. By contrast, our discussion focuses on relations between the daily practices of biomedical professionals and federal regulatory mandates. It draws upon the legal doctrine of equal protection to move beyond such debates and to propose guidelines to address the structural forces imposed by federal regulations that mandate how data about race and ethnicity are used in biomedical research. It offers a framework to manage the tension involved in using existing federally mandated categories of race and ethnicity alongside new scientific findings about human genetic variation.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Race and Reification in ScienceScience, 2005
- Perspective: "Ethnic Drugs"Hastings Center Report, 2005
- Are medical and nonmedical uses of large-scale genomic markers conflating genetics and 'race'?Nature Genetics, 2004
- The International HapMap ProjectNature, 2003
- The Importance of Race and Ethnic Background in Biomedical Research and Clinical PracticeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Race and GenomicsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Medicine and the Racial DivideNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Toward a New Vocabulary of Human Genetic VariationScience, 2002
- Race, Ethnicity, and Genomics: Social Classifications as Proxies of Biological HeterogeneityGenome Research, 2002
- Census, race and scienceNature Genetics, 2000