Sequence assessment of comigrating AFLPTM bands in Echinacea — implications for comparative biological studies
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Genome
- Vol. 47 (1) , 15-25
- https://doi.org/10.1139/g03-094
Abstract
The extent of sequence identity among clones derived from monomorphic and polymorphic AFLPTM polymorphism bands was quantified. A total of 79 fragments from a monomorphic band of 273 bp and 48 fragments from a polymorphic band of 159 bp, isolated from individuals belonging to different populations, varieties, and species of Echinacea, were cloned and sequenced. The monomorphic fragments exhibited above 90% sequence identity among clones within samples. Sequence identity within variety ranged from 82.78% to 94.87% and within species from 75.82% to 98.9% and was 57.97% in the genus. The polymorphic fragments exhibited much less sequence identity. In some instances, even two clones from the same fragment were different in their size and sequence. Within sample, clone sequence identity ranged from 100% to 51.57%, within variety from 33.33% to 100% in one variety, and from 23.66% to 45% within species and was as low as 1.25% within the genus. In addition, sequences of the same size were aligned to verify the nature of their sequence dissimilarity/similarity. Within each size group, identical sequences were found across species and varieties. In general, comigrating bands cannot be considered homologous. Thus, the use of AFLPTM band data for comparative studies is appropriate only if the results emanating from such analyses are considered as approximations and are interpreted as phenotypic but not genotypic.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic relationships inLathyrussect.Lathyrus(Fabaceae) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) dataCanadian Journal of Botany, 2002
- Mobility, diffusion and dispersion of single-stranded DNA in sequencing gelsElectrophoresis, 2001
- Conversion of AFLP bands into high-throughput DNA markersMolecular Genetics and Genomics, 2001
- Gel electrophoretic mobility of single-stranded DNA: The two reptation field-dependent factorsElectrophoresis, 2000
- AFLP genotyping and fingerprintingTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1999
- Conversion of AFLP markers to sequence-specific PCR markers in barley and wheatTheoretical and Applied Genetics, 1999
- The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysisMolecular Breeding, 1996
- CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choiceNucleic Acids Research, 1994
- Computing genetic similarity coefficients from RAPD data: the effects of PCR artifacts.Genome Research, 1994
- Restriction data from chloroplast DNA for phylogenetic reconstruction: Is there only one accurate way of scoring?Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 1991